Sunday, January 24, 2016
I Got Bored Studying For The LSAT, So I Wrote A Humorously Dark Test Question.
An actor and a director are having a conversation:
Director: In action movies, actors should actually shoot each other. Guns and bullets are cheaper and provide more realistic effects than editing and green screens.
Actor: Not so fast. Requiring actors to shoot each other on set would involve gravely wounding and even killing actors.
Which of the following is a flaw in the actor's argument?
(A) The actor assumes, without providing justification, that actors' well-being is more important than saving money.
(B) The actor attacks the director instead of her argument.
(C) Given her occupation, the actor is clearly biased and her argument should be ignored.
(D) The consequences of the director's suggestion, outlined by the actor, are exaggerated.
The answer is (A), by the way.
0 comments:
Post a Comment